
Volume 3, # 1 June 1999
Windows/WINTEL

By H. L. Siddons, Jr.
Category: Computers and Software
A Personal Historical Perspective
Predicting the future can be a dubious task,
especially when dealing with software and operating systems. There are many variables,
including market forces, competition, promotion, user acceptance and costs that influence
the success or failure of any new major software releases. Who knew back in 1985 how
successful Microsoft would become in developing and releasing Windows.
Now many of you out there use the Apple Macintosh, and it has played an important and
pivotal role in the PC industry, but I must admit I have little or no experience, must
less knowledge about that platform. My only direct, albeit limited experience was with the
unsuccessful LISA, the Mac's
predecessor back in 1983. I, like many in the early eighties was more compelled by the IBM
compatible platform. This was simply because my involvement with PC's was in the business
world, and although Apple's new line of GUI based computers were intriguing, the vast
majority of the corporate world embraced IBM's new PC line. And because it was IBM which
historically had provided the corporate world with mainframes, a safe, comfortable,
reliable and proven solution.
However, major kudos should go to Apple for
pioneering the GUI environment. But beyond that, its impact in business has been minimal.
Granted, the Macintosh was built around a GUI
environment and IBM's DOS was not. I admired what the Apple Mac could do and hoped that
someday the IBM compatible world might follow the same path.
In 1981, I had my first experience with the first
4.7mhz IBM PC,
equipped with 64K RAM and a 160K floppy drive. At that time there was virtually NO
software available. (DOS 1.0 and a Pascal Compiler from USCD was all that existed). I
imagined tremendous potential and opportunity for software! From converting a version of
Sweep (a CP/M file manager) to SuperCalc and Dbase over to IBM from the CP/M platform, to
brand new products like Lotus 123, there was a window of opportunity that I foresaw that
would be big business!
I began my career in computers with an OSBORNE II portable
which ran CP/M in 1983. IBM compatibles
were, at the time, simply to expensive for the money.
In 1985 I moved to a Sanyo color portable with a
20MB hard drive and 640K RAM and ran DOS 3.1. I had worked previously with COMPAQ
portables so I had already became well versed in DOS. That year I discovered a new product
from Digital Research, the same company that produced CP/M, called GEM, which stands for
Graphical Environment Manager.
One of the remarkable pieces of software was the word processor, one that used fonts quite
well. I was able to get true WYSIWYG printouts on my Epson FX-80! GEM Desktop included GEM
Write, Draw and Paint. Ventura Publisher was the first major desktop publisher available
for the PC, and it ran under GEM. But GEM only went so far in providing a true GUI
environment.
Later that year, IBM released TOPVIEW, a character
based multitasking environment that might replace DOS someday. Although it was the first
environment that could run more that one DOS application at once, it required more memory
and was slow. Ultimately it was a dismal failure for IBM, but it was the precursor of
OS/2.
I read an article in Byte
Magazine in 1984 about Microsoft's plan for a new GUI/multitasking environment simply
called Windows that Bill Gates promised by 1985. After reading about the features and
capabilities, I was becoming very excited at the prospect. With very little hoopla,
Microsoft released version 1.0 of Windows for $99.00 and I got as soon as it was released
and installed it on my Sanyo.
Windows 1.0 circa 1985

|
I now had multiple-tiling applications like the
clock and write running while executing dBase III plus in a DOS window! Granted it was
slow but I already knew how to use a mouse (GEM taught me that). But like DOS 1.0 and the
first IBM there was only one other piece of genuine Windows software and that was
In-A-Vision from Micrographics. It wasn't until version 2.0 in 1987, did the number of
Windows software increase with Microsoft's own Word 1.0 for Windows and Excel. I really
believed in Microsoft Windows and embraced it, but the rest of world had not caught on
yet. In 1988, IBM and Microsoft had been rumored to be working on OS/2 Presentation
Manager, a GUI version of the operating system that IBM hoped would replace DOS at least
for it's PC line of computers. I must admit, that after Microsoft confirmed this rumor,
and downplayed the significance of Microsoft Windows in the future, I was dubious as to
the future of my favorite environment. Besides, OS/2 would require a 286, preferably a 386
with 8MB of RAM (which in 1988 cost about $1000). |
Luckily, Microsoft backed off on it's commitment
to IBM on OS/2 and they both went their separate ways. In 1989, Microsoft released an
upgrade called Windows/386 taking advantage of the 386 capabilities providing a more
robust multitasking version of Windows.
It was that year that I wrote an article
chronicling the future of Windows from 1989 to 1999 (see BTTF).
But it wasn't until 1990 and again in 1992 did
Windows finally arrive. Version 3.0 and 3.1 ushered in a new dawn for Microsoft and it's
beleaguered GUI shell on top of an aging DOS. This version was more powerful, had new
features such as true fonts, multimedia capabilities and it debuted an avalanche of third
party software that finally outnumbered all DOS based releases. It also required more disk
space and memory, something that is endemic to all subsequent releases of Windows.
 |
 |
Today we have Windows '95, Windows '98, Windows
NT 4.0 and next year Windows 2000 which merges Windows '98 and Windows NT into one
platform bringing us into the next century... |
Other Windows Links
|